Bug#629086: marked as done ([myspell-fr]: Please remove call to soon to disappear 'update-openoffice-dicts')
Your message dated Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:18:34 +0200
with message-id <20110603131834.GA5163@agmartin.aq.upm.es>
and subject line Re: [myspell-fr]: Please remove call to soon to disappear 'update-openoffice-dicts'
has caused the Debian Bug report #629086,
regarding [myspell-fr]: Please remove call to soon to disappear 'update-openoffice-dicts'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
629086: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629086
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: myspell-fr
Version: 1.4-26
Severity: normal
Hi,
Your package still uses an entry in maintainer scripts that calls the
soon to disappear update-openoffice-dicts script in a way that will
fail once it is removed.
If you use dictionaries-common-dev debhelper snippets, please rebuild
your package against at least dictionaries-common-dev 1.10.5 and adjust
Build-Depends accordingly.
Otherwise just remove that part from maintainer scripts.
Thanks in advance,
--
Agustin
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.4-26
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:48:06PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> Package: myspell-fr
> Version: 1.4-26
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package still uses an entry in maintainer scripts that calls the
> soon to disappear update-openoffice-dicts script in a way that will
> fail once it is removed.
>
> If you use dictionaries-common-dev debhelper snippets, please rebuild
> your package against at least dictionaries-common-dev 1.10.5 and adjust
> Build-Depends accordingly.
>
> Otherwise just remove that part from maintainer scripts.
>
> Thanks in advance,
Noticed that this was already fixed in QA upload by Robert Luberda. Closing.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: