[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#177754: marked as done (zblast-x11: New kernels with timer tweaks make zblast too fast)



Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:09:32 +0000
with message-id <E1OuoBQ-00016y-JR@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line Package zblast has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #177754,
regarding zblast-x11: New kernels with timer tweaks make zblast too fast
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
177754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177754
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: zblast-x11
Version: 1.2.1-6
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

Kernels such as 2.4.20-ck2 and 2.5.x have VM tweaks that make zblast 
speed up immensely.

Such speed up is not noticeable on 2.4.20 vanilla.

-Josh

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fuuma 2.5.58-dj1 #5 Wed Jan 15 20:35:46 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages zblast-x11 depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-9    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an 
ii  xlibs                         4.2.1-4    X Window System client libraries   
ii  zblast-data                   1.2.1-6    sound files for zblast game

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3-3+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/177754 in Debian BTS
against the package zblast. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/596524. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna


--- End Message ---

Reply to: