[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#254966: marked as done (nstx should pass through dns queries to a real dns server)

Your message dated 
with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-close@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #254966,
regarding nstx should pass through dns queries to a real dns server
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

254966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=254966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nstx
Severity: wishlist
Version: 1.1-beta4-1

First off, thanks for packaging (and upstream for writing) nstx.

I'd actually like to suggest that the daemon be modified so that it is
capable of passing through real dns requests unrelated to nstx to a
real live DNS server.

I'm not totally sure how this would work yet, myself, but ideally
you'd have bind or similar running on some port besides 53, and
packets for bind would be sent there instead of being handled by nstx.

[I personally haven't walked through the details of nstx myself, so
it's possible that I've missed some basic fundamental reason why this
is not possible.]

Don Armstrong

There is no mechanical problem so difficult that it cannot be solved
by brute strength and ignorance.
 -- William's Law


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.1-beta6-6+rm

nstx has been removed from Debian unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/595988

Closing its bugs with a Version higher than the last unstable upload.

More information about this script at:

--- End Message ---

Reply to: