[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#348608: marked as done (knetfilter: shouldn't /usr/share/applications be used instead of /usr/share/applnk for desktop entries ?)

Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20100901140732.GW12469@melusine.alphascorpii.net>
and subject line Package got removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #348608,
regarding knetfilter: shouldn't /usr/share/applications be used instead of /usr/share/applnk for desktop entries ?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

348608: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348608
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: knetfilter
Version: 3.5.0-1
Severity: minor

Knetfilter store its desktop file in /usr/share/applnk,
shouldn't /usr/share/applications be used instead now ?
(according to
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-0.9.html )

That may be the reason why knetfilter doesn't show up in my gnome menu
like some other kde applications do.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-12-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages knetfilter depends on:
ii  iptables                  1.3.3-2        Linux kernel 2.4+ iptables
ii  kdelibs4c2a               4:3.5.0-3      core libraries for all KDE
ii  libacl1                   2.2.34-1       Access control list shared
ii  libart-2.0-2              2.3.17-1       Library of functions for 2D
ii  libattr1                  2.4.25-1       Extended attribute shared
ii  libaudio2                 1.7-3          The Network Audio System
(NAS). (s
ii  libc6                     2.3.5-11       GNU C Library: Shared
libraries an
ii  libfam0                   2.7.0-8        client library to control
the FAM
ii  libfontconfig1            2.3.2-1.1      generic font configuration
ii  libfreetype6              2.1.10-1       FreeType 2 font engine,
shared lib
ii  libgcc1                   1:4.0.2-6      GCC support library
ii  libice6                   6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 Inter-Client Exchange
ii  libidn11                  0.5.18-1       GNU libidn library,
ii  libjpeg62                 6b-11          The Independent JPEG
Group's JPEG
ii  libpng12-0                1.2.8rel-5     PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3-mt                 3:3.3.5-3      Qt GUI Library (Threaded
runtime v
ii  libsm6                    6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System Session
ii  libstdc++6                4.0.2-6        The GNU Standard C++
Library v3
ii  libx11-6                  6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System protocol
client li
ii  libxcursor1               1.1.3-1        X cursor management library
ii  libxext6                  6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System
miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2                   2.1.7-1        FreeType-based font drawing
ii  libxi6                    6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System Input
extension li
ii  libxinerama1              6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System multi-head
ii  libxrandr2                6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System Resize,
Rotate and
ii  libxrender1               1:    X Rendering Extension
client libra
ii  libxt6                    6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.3-9      compression library -

knetfilter recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.5.0-2+rm


As the package got removed from the archive (please see
http://bugs.debian.org/594626 for details) I hereby close these bug

Best Regards,

--- End Message ---

Reply to: