Bug#562373: closing 562373
On 25/02/10 at 19:53 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Bonsoir Lucas,
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:14:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > reopen 562373
> > notfixed 562373 0.3.13-1
> > thanks
> >
> > On 21/02/10 at 21:42 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > close 562373 0.3.13-1
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > libdc0-dev is available in unstable. -Ralf.
> >
> > No (well, at least not on amd64 and most of the other architectures),
> > not since 0.3.23-1.
>
> There is something strange here. Indeed, madison says:
>
> % rmadison --suite=unstable libdc0-dev
> libdc0-dev | 0.3.13-1 | unstable | armel, hurd-i386
>
> And that is consistent with what packages.debian.org displays.
>
> However, on my amd64/sid machine:
>
> % apt-cache show libdc0-dev
> Package: libdc0-dev
> Priority: optional
> Section: libdevel
> Installed-Size: 2232
> Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
> Architecture: amd64
> Source: libdc0
> Version: 0.3.13-1
> Depends: libdc0c2 (= 0.3.13-1)
> Filename: pool/main/libd/libdc0/libdc0-dev_0.3.13-1_amd64.deb
> [...]
>
> and https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=libdc0 says that libdc0 has
> been compiled for all architectures (except hurd). Any idea what is going
> on here ?
Yes:
0.3.13-1 (which is the previous version of the package) had a libc0-dev
package.
0.3.23-1 (the current version) has a libdc-dev package.
However, on hurd and armel, 0.3.23-1 failed to build (on armel, the
package is marked 'Building', which means that the buildd maintainer
didn't mark it as 'Failed'). So the current version in unstable for hurd
and armel is still 0.3.13-1.
The version you are seeing with apt-cache is probably the version in
testing (if you have both testing and unstable in your
/etc/apt/sources.list).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: