Possible problems in your Debian packages
=== aap:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #564930 <http://bugs.debian.org/564930>
aap: should this package be removed?
=== amavis-stats:
= 2 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #528586 <http://bugs.debian.org/528586>
amavis-stats fails on RRDp dependency
- #528589 <http://bugs.debian.org/528589>
amavis-stats: New version run as daemon and is started with different options
= Not in testing for 179 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=amavis-stats>
=== anymeal:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #514763 <http://bugs.debian.org/514763>
anymeal: crashes for open or new database
= Not in testing for 161 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=anymeal>
=== arch2darcs:
= Missing build(s) on ia64
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=arch2darcs
= No migration to testing for 177 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=arch2darcs>
=== aub:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #564933 <http://bugs.debian.org/564933>
aub: should this package be removed?
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=aub>
=== d4x:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #569648 <http://bugs.debian.org/569648>
d4x: license problem
=== debtags-edit:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #569427 <http://bugs.debian.org/569427>
debtags-edit: FTBFS: DebtagsDocument.h:152: error: 'SigC' has not been declared
=== directvnc:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #553887 <http://bugs.debian.org/553887>
directvnc: should this package be removed?
= Not in testing for 91 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=directvnc>
=== doc-rfc:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #287224 <http://bugs.debian.org/287224>
doc-rfc-3000-3999: RFC packages are missing hundreds of RFCs
= Not in testing for 1718 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=doc-rfc>
= Lintian: 87 error(s) and 66 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#doc-rfc
=== egroupware:
= 3 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #554455 <http://bugs.debian.org/554455>
/usr/share/egroupware/etemplate/doc: egroupware etemplate/doc directory not correctly detected
- #540716 <http://bugs.debian.org/540716>
Needs to be actively maintained or removed
- #504283 <http://bugs.debian.org/504283>
CVE-2007-3215: phpmailer issue (embedded code-copy)
= Not in testing for 179 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=egroupware>
=== fdutils:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #548434 <http://bugs.debian.org/548434>
fdformat fails completely with current kernel
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 12 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#fdutils
=== fte:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #379778 <http://bugs.debian.org/379778>
fte: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD (due to unsatisfied Build-Depends on libgpmg1-dev)
Part of release goal: kfreebsd-* as release architectures
=== gdb-m68hc1x:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #560581 <http://bugs.debian.org/560581>
gdb-m68hc1x: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `m68hc11-rom.o', needed by `libgdb.a'. Stop.
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gdb-m68hc1x>
=== gnats:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #558207 <http://bugs.debian.org/558207>
gnats: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: outdated build system
Part of release goal: kfreebsd-* as release architectures
= Lintian: 2 error(s) and 22 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#gnats
=== gq:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #555325 <http://bugs.debian.org/555325>
gq: version 1.3.4 completely unusable
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gq>
=== grepmail:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #549782 <http://bugs.debian.org/549782>
grepmail: FTBFS: tests failed
=== hamlib:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #559814 <http://bugs.debian.org/559814>
CVE-2009-3736 local privilege escalation
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 49 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#hamlib
=== herrie:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #553900 <http://bugs.debian.org/553900>
herrie: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)?
=== html2ps:
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 4 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#html2ps
=== iceowl-l10n:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #546189 <http://bugs.debian.org/546189>
iceowl-l10n-it: install.rdf problem
= Not in testing for 33 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=iceowl-l10n>
=== im-sdk:
= 2 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #553113 <http://bugs.debian.org/553113>
iiimf-server: postinst-must-call-ldconfig /usr/lib/libiiimutils.so.0.0.0 by the dynamic library loader. Therefore, the package must call "ldconfig" in its postinst script.
- #548465 <http://bugs.debian.org/548465>
im-sdk: FTBFS:
= Missing build(s) on amd64 ia64 powerpc s390 sparc
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=im-sdk
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=im-sdk>
= Lintian: 5 error(s) and 220 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#im-sdk
=== isdnutils:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #559425 <http://bugs.debian.org/559425>
isdnutils: various licensing issues
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 23 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#isdnutils
=== ksimus-datarecorder:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #534032 <http://bugs.debian.org/534032>
ksimus-datarecorder: FTBFS: required file `admin/config.guess' not found
=== ksimus-floatingpoint:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #533982 <http://bugs.debian.org/533982>
ksimus-floatingpoint: FTBFS: required file `admin/config.guess' not found
=== libcgi:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #564934 <http://bugs.debian.org/564934>
libcgi: should this package be removed?
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libcgi>
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 8 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#libcgi
=== libvncserver:
= No migration to testing for 188 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libvncserver>
=== mgp:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #568339 <http://bugs.debian.org/568339>
mgp segfaults on existing mgp files and all the supplied examples
=== mnogosearch:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #564345 <http://bugs.debian.org/564345>
mnogosearch: FTBFS: rmdir: failed to remove `build-': No such file or directory
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=mnogosearch>
= Lintian: 3 error(s) and 12 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#mnogosearch
=== modconf:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #564355 <http://bugs.debian.org/564355>
modconf: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: linux-source-2.6.31
=== mol-drivers-linux:
= Not in testing for 82 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=mol-drivers-linux>
=== ncurses:
= 2 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #563272 <http://bugs.debian.org/563272>
libtic.so is a dangling symlink
- #553239 <http://bugs.debian.org/553239>
libncurses5-dbg: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libform.so.5.7 and 4 others but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted from the Depends line for this package in debian/control.
= Lintian: 2 error(s) and 26 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#ncurses
=== netbeans-ide:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #506294 <http://bugs.debian.org/506294>
includes sourceless jar files
= Not in testing for 76 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=netbeans-ide>
= Lintian: 60 error(s) and 145 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#netbeans-ide
=== newpki-client:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #334229 <http://bugs.debian.org/334229>
newpki-client: Please remove the empty debconf templates file
Part of release goal: I18n support in all debconf-using packages
= Missing build(s) on armel
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=newpki-client
=== newpki-server:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #544188 <http://bugs.debian.org/544188>
newpki-client hang during connection with 'Initializing SLL Layer'
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=newpki-server>
=== opencryptoki:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #559405 <http://bugs.debian.org/559405>
opencryptoki: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Part of release goal: kfreebsd-* as release architectures
= Lintian: 2 error(s) and 6 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#opencryptoki
=== openntpd:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #522698 <http://bugs.debian.org/522698>
openntpd: segfaults after start on kfreebsd-i386
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=openntpd>
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 2 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#openntpd
=== pcsc-omnikey:
= No migration to testing for 284 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=pcsc-omnikey>
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 4 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#pcsc-omnikey
=== pdumpfs:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #530160 <http://bugs.debian.org/530160>
pdumpfs: bashism in /bin/sh script
Part of release goal: switch /bin/sh to dash
=== postman:
= 2 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #561400 <http://bugs.debian.org/561400>
postman: should this package be removed?
- #560479 <http://bugs.debian.org/560479>
postman: FTBFS: Utils.cc:58: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*'
= Not in testing for 49 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=postman>
=== saods9:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #520258 <http://bugs.debian.org/520258>
Deadlock in futex() on exit
= Not in testing for 83 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=saods9>
= Lintian: 15 error(s) and 11 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#saods9
=== smlnj:
= 2 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #530119 <http://bugs.debian.org/530119>
libsmlnj-smlnj: bashism in /bin/sh script
Part of release goal: switch /bin/sh to dash
- #562359 <http://bugs.debian.org/562359>
smlnj: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: tetex-extra
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=smlnj>
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 23 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/packages@qa.debian.org.html#smlnj
=== snooper:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #474336 <http://bugs.debian.org/474336>
snooper: should this package be removed?
=== sqlrelay:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #562947 <http://bugs.debian.org/562947>
fails to upgrade
= Missing build(s) on amd64 armel i386 s390
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sqlrelay
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=sqlrelay>
=== steam:
= 2 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #530194 <http://bugs.debian.org/530194>
steam: bashism in /bin/sh script
Part of release goal: switch /bin/sh to dash
- #455019 <http://bugs.debian.org/455019>
steam -- Doesn't purge all files after piuparts Install+Upgrade+Purge test
Part of release goal: piuparts-clean archive
=== thttpd:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #208437 <http://bugs.debian.org/208437>
thttpd: Internal server error trying to fetch a 4.2 GB file
Part of release goal: Remove arbitrary file size limits
=== ude:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #561402 <http://bugs.debian.org/561402>
ude: should this package be removed?
=== valknut:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #562373 <http://bugs.debian.org/562373>
valknut: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libdc0-dev
=== wip:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #564938 <http://bugs.debian.org/564938>
wip: should this package be removed?
=== xenwatch:
= No migration to testing for 188 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=xenwatch>
=== xml-resume-library:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #528121 <http://bugs.debian.org/528121>
xml-resume-library: contains non-free material
= Not in testing for 83 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=xml-resume-library>
=== xplc:
= No migration to testing for 380 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=xplc>
=== yagiuda:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #567963 <http://bugs.debian.org/567963>
yagiuda: -t and -T can't be specified together as indicated in doc
= No migration to testing for 97 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=yagiuda>
=== Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS:
bgoffice 4.1 (Debian: 3.0-10)
denemo 0.8.12 (Debian: 0.8.10-1)
gengetopt 2.22.4 (Debian: 2.22.2-1)
glfer 0.4.2 (Debian: 0.4.1-3)
gtkpbbuttons 0.6.10 (Debian: 0.6.9-2)
hamlib 1.2.10 (Debian: 1.2.9-2)
html2ps 1.0b6 (Debian: 1.0b5-5)
hydrogen 0.9.4 (Debian: 0.9.3-7)
isdnutils 20071127 (Debian: 3.9.20060704-9)
ivtools 1.2.8 (Debian: 1.2.6-1+nmu3)
ktimetrace 0.2.37 (Debian: 0.2.36-5)
libdockapp 0.6.2 (Debian: 0.5.0-3)
libvformat 1.13r2 (Debian: 1.13-5)
mn-fit 5.14 (Debian: 5.13-7)
mnogosearch 3.3.9 (Debian: 3.3.8-2)
powerprefs 0.8.0 (Debian: 0.5.1-2)
pynetsnmp 0.28.14 (Debian: 0.28.13-3)
python-biggles 1.6.5 (Debian: 1.6.4-5)
saods9 6.0 (Debian: 4.0b7-2)
sffview 0.4.0 (Debian: 0.4-4)
songwrite songwrite2-0.2.1 (Debian: 0.14-8)
sqlrelay 0.41 (Debian: 0.39.4-9)
sysprof 1.1.4 (Debian: 1.0.12-1)
tgif 4.2.2 (Debian: 4.1.45-2)
trousers 0.3.4 (Debian: 0.3.2-9)
u++ 5.5.0 (Debian: 5.3.0-2)
uriparser 0.7.5 (Debian: 0.7.4-2)
valknut 0.4.9 (Debian: 0.3.13-1)
varkon 1.19D (Debian: 1.18B-1)
xalan 1.10.0 (Debian: 1.10-4)
xfs 1.1.0 (Debian: 1.0.8-6)
xmcd 3.3.2 (Debian: 2.6-22)
------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.
If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.
All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.
A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=packages@qa.debian.org
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Lucas Nussbaum
Reply to: