[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#305773: marked as done (positron: does case-sensitive searches on Neuros filesystem under some charsets)

Your message dated Fri,  5 Feb 2010 01:17:54 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <20100205011754.AB5D111053@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package positron has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #305773,
regarding positron: does case-sensitive searches on Neuros filesystem under some charsets
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

305773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=305773
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: positron
Version: 1:1.1-1
Severity: important

I just tried to sync using positron.  It gave the following message:

# positron sync
Synchronizing Neuros music database.

  Checking for new music...        Copying 778 new tracks.Madrigal_...
    1. 01-Oboe Quartet in F (K370) - Allegro-American Baroque.ogg...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/positron", line 205, in ?
  File "/usr/bin/positron", line 187, in main
    cmd.run(config, myNeuros, remaining[1:])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/positron/cmd_sync.py", line 131, in run    add_track(neuros, sourcename, targetname, metadata)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/positron/add_file.py", line 79, in add_track
    util.copy_file(sourcename, targetname)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/positron/util.py", line 40, in copy_file
    os.makedirs(dirname)  # Does not work with UNC paths on Win32
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/os.py", line 153, in makedirs
    makedirs(head, mode)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/os.py", line 153, in makedirs
    makedirs(head, mode)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/os.py", line 154, in makedirs
    mkdir(name, mode)
OSError: [Errno 17] File exists: '/media/neuros/MUSIC'

After modifying /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/positron/config.py* to
replace "MUSIC" with "music", it now works better -- it now copies some

AFAICT, when positron looks for the music directory, it does a
case-sensitive search.  However, the FAT filesystem is case insensitive.
Since my Neuros has the directory /music instead of /MUSIC, positron
does not find the music directory, even though it is there, and when it
attempts to create it, it fails.

However, it still has some problems copying some files, even after the
change.  On my Neuros, I have a directory /music/u2, while positron is
trying to create a directory /music/U2, and this is failing... (similar
error message as above.)

I deleted /music/u2, and now it is recopying that whole tree (although
for some reason the directory still gets created as "u2" rather than
"U2".  So it seems to be working for now, until the next time I do a
sync, when it will attempt to create the /music/U2 directory again...

(I think that positron used to work correctly.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-mm3
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages positron depends on:
ii  python                        2.3.5-2    An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-id3                    1.2-6.1    Python module for id3-tags manipul
ii  python-pyvorbis               1.3-1      A Python interface to the Ogg Vorb

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.1-2+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/305773 in Debian BTS
against the package positron. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/392672. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: