Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)
- To: Rene Engelhard <email@example.com>
- Cc: Kalle Kivimaa <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Debian OpenOffice Team <email@example.com>, Aigars Mahinovs <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Martin-Éric Racine <email@example.com>, Vedran Furač <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Alastair McKinstry <email@example.com>, Roland Rosenfeld <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Miroslav Kure <email@example.com>, Debian QA Group <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Maintainers of Mozilla-related packages <email@example.com>, Changwoo Ryu <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Thijs Kinkhorst <email@example.com>, Debian Hebrew Packaging Team <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Debian Arabic Packaging Team <email@example.com>, John Steele Scott <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)
- From: Mike Hommey <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:22:24 +0100
- Message-id: <20100125112224.GA2714@glandium.org>
- In-reply-to: <20100125111312.GB23631@rene-engelhard.de>
- References: <20100125085600.GA6878@glandium.org> <handler.s.C.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20100125092314.GA23631@rene-engelhard.de> <20100125111312.GB23631@rene-engelhard.de>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:13:12PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:58:27AM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Processing commands for email@example.com:
> > >
> > > > # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604.
> > > > # For the other packages, only a "binNMU" is necessary.
> > > > # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all packages)
> > And some of those packages have the - symlinks hardcoded in .links.
> > At least many I did have.
> > Did you check that? :)
> > And don't forget we still have packages not updated for this afaik.
> > Like icedove? Maybe also iceape.
> Discussion on IRC showed that iceape will be fixed, as will icedove 3.
> Shouldn't you have filed the bug *after* you fixed them in
> any case so that those dicts won't stop working? (And eventually
> we should add a Breaks:?)
As said on IRC, they won't break, they will possibly shown as xx_XX
instead of a nice label, if the remaining file is in the xx_XX (instead