[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#549143: marked as done (libnss-lwres: Pending removal of automake{1.4,1.7}, please update for automake1.9 or higher)



Your message dated Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:39:59 +0000
with message-id <E1MtUJb-0001wh-9a@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#549143: fixed in libnss-lwres 0.93-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #549143,
regarding libnss-lwres: Pending removal of automake{1.4,1.7}, please update for automake1.9 or higher
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
549143: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549143
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnss-lwres
Version: 0.93-5
Severity: normal

Hi,

We are working on removing older versions of automake.  Your package
currently build-depends on automake1.4/1.7.  Please update the package
to build with 1.9 or higher.  Preferably 1.11.

Thank you,

Barry deFreese
Debian QA




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libnss-lwres
Source-Version: 0.93-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libnss-lwres, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnss-lwres_0.93-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-lwres/libnss-lwres_0.93-6.diff.gz
libnss-lwres_0.93-6.dsc
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-lwres/libnss-lwres_0.93-6.dsc
libnss-lwres_0.93-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libn/libnss-lwres/libnss-lwres_0.93-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 549143@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Barry deFreese <bdefreese@debian.org> (supplier of updated libnss-lwres package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:23:19 -0400
Source: libnss-lwres
Binary: libnss-lwres
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.93-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Barry deFreese <bdefreese@debian.org>
Description: 
 libnss-lwres - NSS module for using bind9's lwres as a naming service
Closes: 549143
Changes: 
 libnss-lwres (0.93-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Remove autotools build-deps. (Closes: #549143).
   * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.3. (No changes needed).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 53d06735a676221a5921533965508aea78a67479 1017 libnss-lwres_0.93-6.dsc
 32739debdb98d0aeed108f589fb9a2ca611387e7 23498 libnss-lwres_0.93-6.diff.gz
 f4ba27c5556fa0bdeafb57bfc150404f571ef415 7882 libnss-lwres_0.93-6_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 926620ae7fa0344c2540e22d1ad3edb016f8fce1dfe1a3e81bfd209cd5e13f55 1017 libnss-lwres_0.93-6.dsc
 47a68745b2f652e18d4f5a599f3646ccdb677108793ca77f0aa25b9ce2cd379a 23498 libnss-lwres_0.93-6.diff.gz
 c6911040207e07edaa6eecae005a2f9bc9ff9aea5046613e528eae631388a3b6 7882 libnss-lwres_0.93-6_i386.deb
Files: 
 a1bc015347c396c8ae90e5e83caa497d 1017 net optional libnss-lwres_0.93-6.dsc
 80d093d061b67dc7640ef1ba6d9fb73b 23498 net optional libnss-lwres_0.93-6.diff.gz
 f7add5484a20e2dbe969eef7cffcb62a 7882 net optional libnss-lwres_0.93-6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrFEXcACgkQ5ItltUs5T34c0wCg82/7totQGclY//ir39/RKzhm
jR4AnA0LB9oRON+w2vfRa9Euef4Z+QNj
=5Izz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: