[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#211589: marked as done (fblogo seems to habe Problems with 4-Bit Images)



Your message dated Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:10:17 GMT
with message-id <200901182010.n0IKAHZC010376@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line fblogo has been removed from Debian, closing #211589
has caused the Debian Bug report #211589,
regarding fblogo seems to habe Problems with 4-Bit Images
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
211589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211589
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fblogo
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: normal

I tried several images with a colour deep of 4 bit (using both the netpbm
and the ImageMagick method) and all looked wried (I think the lines where to
short).
Converting the image to a depth of 8 bit solved the problem.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux annuminas 2.4.22 #1 Tue Sep 16 12:24:25 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro

Versions of packages fblogo depends on:
ii  diff                          2.8.1-2    File comparison utilities
ii  libc6                         2.3.2-7    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpng12-0                    1.2.5.0-4  PNG library - runtime

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.5.1-3+rm

The fblogo package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/427139 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply to: