[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#510274: Reproduced in Lenny



Hello (back) Peter,

sorry for the messy-looking mail, but people still didn't get how the
BTS work; that's why I'm fully quoting the mail.

Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> (03/01/2009):
> > For every presentation I try to start (sample.mpg, sendmail6.mpg,
> > v6.mpg), mgp dies with an X error. I've reproduced this on several
> > systems (including one running pure testing). This might be the same
> > bug as #400105, though in that report the error message is
> > different. I can't reproduce this problem with mgp 1.13b-2 (the
> > version in unstable).
> 
> $ rmadison mgp
>        mgp |    1.11b-7 |     etch-m68k | source, m68k
>        mgp |    1.11b-7 |        stable | source, alpha, amd64, arm,
> hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc mgp |    1.11b-7
> |       testing | source, alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc mgp |    1.11b-7 |      unstable | m68k
>        mgp |    1.13a-1 |      unstable | source, alpha, amd64, arm,
> armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> 
> 
> Unstable has 1.13a-1 - have you been able to test that version?

When asking… ask someone. Keep the submitter in To or Cc.

> 1.13a-1 works for me (despite a few warning messages on the console).
> 
> If this bug is absent in 1.13a-1, debian-release may be happy to allow
> 1.13a-1 to migrate to fix this bug.
> 
> In a Lenny chroot, I'm able to reproduce the bug (1.11b-7):
> 
> X Error of failed request:  BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
>   Major opcode of failed request:  75 (X_PolyText16)
>   Serial number of failed request:  206
>   Current serial number in output stream:  210
> 
> Taking a look at the amount of changes . . . 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Neil Williams
> =============
> http://www.data-freedom.org/
> http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
> http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
> 

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: