[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#311002: marked as done (metamail should provide mmencode as a synonym for mimencode)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:34:51 +0100
with message-id <20091220213451.GK3781@szczaw.snafu.pl>
and subject line metamail has been removed from archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #311002,
regarding metamail should provide mmencode as a synonym for mimencode
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

311002: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=311002
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-47
Severity: important

Some programs that depend on metamail invoke mimencode via its old 8.3
/bin/bash: line 1: wq: command not found

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22-xfs
Locale: LANG=en_IE.iso885915@euro, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.iso885915@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages metamail depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5                 5.4-4        Shared libraries for terminal hand

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.7-54+rm
Package: metamail

The metamail package has been recently removed[1] from unstable, and I am
closing all leftover bugs.


[1] http://bugs.debian.org/274451
"Cywilizacja powstała w momencie, kiedy pierwszy człowiek dał drugiemu 
 banana za zamiecenie jaskini. Jestem o tym przekonana."

--- End Message ---

Reply to: