Bug#558093: python-wxgtk2.8: cannot import wx.aui module
Package: python-wxgtk2.8
Version: 2.8.7.1-2+b1
Severity: normal
I see the following behaviour on my system:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% python
Python 2.5.4 (r254:67916, Nov 19 2009, 19:46:21)
[GCC 4.3.4] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import wx ; import wx.aui
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ImportError: No module named aui
>>> exit()
% locate wx/aui
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/wx-2.8-gtk2-unicode/wx/aui.py
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/wx-2.8-gtk2-unicode/wx/aui.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wx-2.8-gtk2-unicode/wx/aui.py
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wx-2.8-gtk2-unicode/wx/aui.pyc
%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
my best regards
gb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages python-wxgtk2.8 depends on:
ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.4.2-3 GCC support library
ii libstdc++6 4.4.2-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libwxbase2.8-0 2.8.7.1-2+b1 wxBase library (runtime) - non-GUI
ii libwxgtk2.8-0 2.8.7.1-2+b1 wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t
ii python 2.5.4-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-central 0.6.13 register and build utility for Pyt
ii python-wxversion 2.6.3.2.2-3.1 wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t
python-wxgtk2.8 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages python-wxgtk2.8 suggests:
pn python-xml <none> (no description available)
pn wx2.8-doc <none> (no description available)
pn wx2.8-examples <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Reply to: