[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#553797: marked as done (galternatives: should this package be removed?)

Your message dated Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:25:03 -0800
with message-id <20091108192503.GB11778@jade.home>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #553797,
regarding galternatives: should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
553797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: galternatives
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal

Dear Maintainer,

While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:

* Missing upstream.
* Buggy.
* ITA'd for over 3 years.
* No reverse depends/build-depends.
* Low popcon scores.

If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
just close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues.

If you agree that it should be removed, send the following commands to
control@bugs.debian.org (replace nnnnnn with this bug's number):

severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons>
thanks

For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt

Thank you,

Barry deFreese
Debian QA

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I think that this tool should be kept. I'm working on a rewrite,
however it takes time. I intend on finishing it before the end of the
year. and it's not *that* buggy...nothing serious that I know of, it
should still be useful in it's current state.

-- 
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanryan52@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: