[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#549407: ivtools 1.2.6-1 FTBFS on sparc



On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:49:37PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> Hi, debian-sparc people,
> 
> This is a strange FTBFS. I uploaded a NMU fixing the 64bit build (#545834), but
> seems that this problem is not a temporary buildd problem but is still present.
> More funny, build previously worked for powerpc, but now a bug similar to this
> one appeared (nothing was touched in that area), so this particular FTBFS
> currently happens only in sparc and in powerpc. I am thinking about a race
> condition, but want to look more.
> 
> I'd like to try building the package in smetana and see what happens, but
> libace-dev is missing from its sid dchroot.

I finally could build this package sucessfully at smetana.debian.org. No
problems appeared with the sid dchroot, so this seems to be indeed a race
condition because lebrun seems to be a faster box than smetana.

I plan to upload a new NMU with minimal changes.

One is just calling the offending target (where things fail) with -j1. Seems
that the only way to really test this in a equivalent box is a new upload
(Yes, I hate this).

I also plan to fix lintian error 

 * E weak-library-dev-dependency                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                                                          
          * ivtools-dev on libiv1 (>= ${binary:Version})                                                                                                                  
          * ivtools-dev on libiv-unidraw1 (>= ${binary:Version})                        

Since I uploaded last NMU and changes are minimal, I will probably do this
with no delay and soon. I will however wait a couple of days for
suggestions/objections. Comments are of course welcome.

Regards,

-- 
Agustin



Reply to: