[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#552669: maintainer-script-modifies-netbase-managed-file preinst:9 /etc/services



Package: afbackup
Version: 3.5.3-2
Severity: serious
User: lintian-maint@debian.org
Usertags: maintainer-script-modifies-netbase-managed-file

Justification: The configuration files /etc/services, /etc/protocols, and
               /etc/rpc are managed by the netbase package and must not be
               modified by other packages.

Instead of doing this, please file a wishlist bug against netbase to have an
appropriate entry added.

Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 11.2 (Daemons) for details. 

,----[ 11.2 Daemons ]
| The configuration files /etc/services, /etc/protocols, and /etc/rpc are managed
| by the netbase package and must not be modified by other packages.
| 
| If a package requires a new entry in one of these files, the maintainer should
| get in contact with the netbase maintainer, who will add the entries and release
| a new version of the netbase package.
`----

        manoj


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.4-anzu-2 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages afbackup depends on:
pn  afbackup-common             <none>       (no description available)
ii  debianutils                 3.2.1        Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libc6                       2.10.1-2     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libssl0.9.8                 0.9.8k-5     SSL shared libraries
ii  openbsd-inetd [inet-superse 0.20080125-3 The OpenBSD Internet Superserver
ii  tcsh [c-shell]              6.14.00-7    TENEX C Shell, an enhanced version

afbackup recommends no packages.

Versions of packages afbackup suggests:
pn  afbackup-client               <none>     (no description available)



Reply to: