[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package grepmail



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package grepmail
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #254045 (http://bugs.debian.org/254045)
> #  * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102207&aid=2840867&group_id=2207
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> Pending
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> Works-For-Me
> usertags 254045 + status-Pending resolution-Works-For-Me
Bug#254045: date expressions does not work at all, grepmail confused
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-Pending resolution-Works-For-Me.
> # remote status report for #301447 (http://bugs.debian.org/301447)
> #  * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102207&aid=2840869&group_id=2207
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> Open
> usertags 301447 + status-Open
Bug#301447: should decode mail before searching
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-Open.
> # remote status report for #432083 (http://bugs.debian.org/432083)
> #  * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102207&aid=2840872&group_id=2207
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> Closed
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> Fixed
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 432083 + fixed-upstream
Bug #432083 [grepmail] grepmail: escaped /-char in complex search expression
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 432083 + status-Closed resolution-Fixed
Bug#432083: grepmail: escaped /-char in complex search expression
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-Fixed status-Closed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


Reply to: