[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#173230: marked as done (mimedecode: MIME-Decode decodes incorrectly)



Your message dated Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:42:54 +0100
with message-id <1251067374.070666.9137.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package mimedecode has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #173230,
regarding mimedecode: MIME-Decode decodes incorrectly
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
173230: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=173230
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mimedecode
Version: 1.9-2
Severity: important

Hi.

I just ran into this:

Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ger=FCcht_oder_wahr:_news.cis.dfn.de_wird_kostenpflich?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?tig=3F?=

is transformed into:

Subject: Re: Gerücht oder wahr: news.cis.dfn.de wird kostenpflich tig?
								 ^

that space shouldn't be there (According to RfC2047 Examples)

Cord


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dexter.mediaways.net 2.4.20 #1 Fri Nov 29 16:54:59 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro

Versions of packages mimedecode depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-5    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


-- 
BOFH excuse #34:

(l)user error


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.9-4+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/173230 in Debian BTS
against the package mimedecode. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/354177. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply to: