Bug#509736: marked as done (grace6: Grace6 incompatible with t1-cyrillic package)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:44:14 +0100
with message-id <200906151844.n5FIiEv4012077@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line grace6 has been removed from Debian, closing #509736
has caused the Debian Bug report #509736,
regarding grace6: Grace6 incompatible with t1-cyrillic package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
509736: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509736
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: grace6: Grace6 incompatible with t1-cyrillic package
- From: Antoine Sirinelli <debian@monte-stello.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:15:46 +0000
- Message-id: <20081225161535.GA18802@pokemon>
Package: grace6
Version: 5.99.1+dev4-5.1
Severity: important
With a working grace6 package, if you install the 't1-cyrillic' font
package, you cannot run grace6 anymore. The error message is the
following:
Broken or incomplete installation - read the FAQ!
If you purge t1-cyrillic, you have to run 'dpkg-reconfigure grace6'
to make grace6 work again.
I do not know if the bug is link to t1-cyrillic but it affects
grace6 which does not depend on it.
Antoine
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.27 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages grace6 depends on:
ii defoma 0.11.10-0.2 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f
ii fftw2 2.1.3-22 library for computing Fast Fourier
ii gconf2 2.22.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste
ii gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-3 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
ii lesstif2 1:0.95.0-2.1 OSF/Motif 2.1 implementation relea
ii libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libexpat1 2.0.1-4 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg62 6b-14 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libplot2c2 2.5-2+b1 The GNU plotutils libraries
ii libpng12-0 1.2.27-2 PNG library - runtime
ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library
ii libt1-5 5.1.2-3 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxp6 1:1.0.0.xsf1-2 X Printing Extension (Xprint) clie
ii libxpm4 1:3.5.7-1 X11 pixmap library
ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii xmhtml1 1.1.7-14 A Motif widget for display HTML 3.
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime
grace6 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages grace6 suggests:
ii ghostscript-x [gs] 8.62.dfsg.1-3.1 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF
ii tetex-bin 2007.dfsg.1-4 TeX Live: teTeX transitional packa
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 509736-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: grace6 has been removed from Debian, closing #509736
- From: Marco Rodrigues <gothicx@sapo.pt>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:44:14 +0100
- Message-id: <200906151844.n5FIiEv4012077@kmos.homeip.net>
Version: 5.99.1+dev4-7+rm
The grace6 package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/459484 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
Reply to: