[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#249013: marked as done (gnome-apt: The dependencies tree should be recursive)

Your message dated Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:20:01 +0100
with message-id <200906081820.n58IK19Y014957@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line gnome-apt has been removed from Debian, closing #249013
has caused the Debian Bug report #249013,
regarding gnome-apt: The dependencies tree should be recursive
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
249013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=249013
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gnome-apt
Version: 0.4.7-1
Severity: wishlist

In the tree of dependencies each dependant package should also have subtree
of its depends. So we would have a recursively expanding tree.

This tree will be infinite because of circular dependencies. So it should
be populated dynamically.

Also there should be a command (menu item or even a toolbar button) to move
the cursor in the tree from a subitem which specifies a dependency to the
"main" item of this package in the tree (to the same package but on an
upper level).

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.4.9-5+rm

The gnome-apt package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/414526 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---
Reply to: