Bug#65382: marked as done (diald: Not routing during downtime)
Your message dated Thu, 7 May 2009 19:45:48 +0100
with message-id <200905071845.n47Ijmkj014589@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line diald has been removed from Debian, closing #65382
has caused the Debian Bug report #65382,
regarding diald: Not routing during downtime
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
65382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=65382
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: diald
Version: 0.99.1-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if it were possible to have diald tear down the default
route it provides when the link is being held down. That would mean things
that try to use the network in that time would find out it's not going to
work much faster.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux scherazerade 2.2.14 #9 Sat Jan 8 02:14:55 GMT 2000 i486 unknown
Versions of the packages diald depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.3-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libwrap0 7.6-4 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers library
ii netbase 3.18-4 Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
ii ppp 2.3.11-1.4 Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daemon.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 65382-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: diald has been removed from Debian, closing #65382
- From: Marco Rodrigues <gothicx@sapo.pt>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:45:48 +0100
- Message-id: <200905071845.n47Ijmkj014589@kmos.homeip.net>
Version: 0.99.4-9+rm
The diald package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/526512 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
Reply to: