[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#64879: marked as done (diald: Don't appear to be able to specify time-dependant chat scripts)

Your message dated Thu, 7 May 2009 19:45:41 +0100
with message-id <200905071845.n47IjfKL014541@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line diald has been removed from Debian, closing #64879
has caused the Debian Bug report #64879,
regarding diald: Don't appear to be able to specify time-dependant chat scripts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
64879: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=64879
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: diald
Version: 0.99.1-1
Severity: normal

If I try to specify something like:

restrict 8:00:00   18:00:00 1-5 * *
down
restrict 0:00:00   7:59:59   * * *
connect "/usr/sbin/chat -f /etc/chatscripts/provider1"
restrict *         *        * * *
connect "/usr/sbin/chat -f /etc/chatscripts/provider2"

diald always uses the provider2 chatscript to diald the phone.  As far as
I can tell from the manual page this should work.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux scherazerade 2.2.14 #9 Sat Jan 8 02:14:55 GMT 2000 i486 unknown

Versions of the packages diald depends on:
ii  libc6          2.1.3-10       GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libwrap0       7.6-4          Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers library
ii  netbase        3.18-4         Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
ii  ppp            2.3.11-1.4     Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daemon.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.99.4-9+rm

The diald package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/526512 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---
Reply to: