[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#519307: marked as done (dfb++: FTBFS: error: cannot convert 'DirectResult' to 'DFBResult' in initialization)

Your message dated Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:09:48 GMT
with message-id <200903272309.n2RN9mqU013426@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line dfb++ has been removed from Debian, closing #519307
has caused the Debian Bug report #519307,
regarding dfb++: FTBFS: error: cannot convert 'DirectResult' to 'DFBResult' in initialization
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

519307: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dfb++
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious


Your package is failing to build with the following error:
idirectfb.cpp: In member function 'IDirectFB* IDirectFB::AddRef()':
idirectfb.cpp:40: error: cannot convert 'DirectResult' to 'DFBResult' in initialization
idirectfb.cpp: In member function 'void IDirectFB::Release()':
idirectfb.cpp:49: error: cannot convert 'DirectResult' to 'DFBResult' in initialization
make[3]: *** [idirectfb.lo] Error 1


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0.0-4+rm

The dfb++ package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/465404 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: