Bug#486911: galrey: bashism in /bin/sh script
Package: galrey
Severity: important
Version: 1.0.2-2
User: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package)
check I've found your package containing one or more /bin/sh scripts making
use of bashisms.
checkbashisms' output:
> possible bashism in ./usr/share/galrey/massscale.sh line 9 (declare):
> declare -a iinfo
> possible bashism in ./usr/share/galrey/massscale.sh line 10 (declare):
> declare -a reqXY
> possible bashism in ./usr/share/galrey/massscale.sh line 14 (bash arrays,
> ${name[0|*|@]}):
> reqX=${reqXY[0]}
> possible bashism in ./usr/share/galrey/massscale.sh line 15 (bash arrays,
> ${name[0|*|@]}):
> reqY=${reqXY[1]}
> possible bashism in ./usr/share/galrey/massscale.sh line 21 (bash arrays,
> ${name[0|*|@]}):
> realX=${iinfo[0]}
> possible bashism in ./usr/share/galrey/massscale.sh line 22 (bash arrays,
> ${name[0|*|@]}):
> realY=${iinfo[1]}
> possible bashism in ./usr/share/galrey/rennum.sh line 8 (should be read
> [-r] variable):
> read
Not using bash (or a Debian Policy conformant shell interpreter which does
provide such an extra feature) as /bin/sh is likely to lead to errors or
unexpected behaviours.
Please be aware that although bash is currently the default /bin/sh there's a
release goal for Lenny to make dash the default /bin/sh[1].
If you want more information about dash as /bin/sh, you can read:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00189.html
For more information please refer to the Debian Policy section 10.4 supporting
this argument at:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-scripts
Hints about how to fix bashisms:
Sometimes these bugs are already fixed in Ubuntu, look at the PTS.
If not already fixed you can read:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh
[1]http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt
Thank you,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Reply to: