[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#437903: marked as done (reppu: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:45:02 +0100
with message-id <200804292245.m3TMj2F6009334@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line reppu has been removed from Debian, closing #437903
has caused the Debian Bug report #437903,
regarding reppu: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
437903: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437903
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: reppu
Version: 0.1-3
Severity: wishlist
User: buildd@naquadah.org
Usertags: nostrip

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip.
Final binaries are still stripped.

If you call dh_strip correctly in debian/rules, this may mean that upstream
is stripping anyway.
You should look for call to strip, ld -s or install -s which may strip binaries.


> Automatic build of reppu_0.1-3 on octave for sid/i386 by rebuildd 0.2.2-r136
> Build started at 2007-08-14 18:26:44.672522
> ******************************************************************************
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Need to get 30.1kB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main reppu 0.1-3 (dsc) [549B]
> Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main reppu 0.1-3 (tar) [26.9kB]
> Get:3 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main reppu 0.1-3 (diff) [2595B]
> Fetched 30.1kB in 0s (208kB/s)
> Download complete and in download only mode
> W: /home/staff/jd/.pbuilderrc does not exist
> I: using fakeroot in build.
> Current time: Tue Aug 14 18:26:49 UTC 2007
> pbuilder-time-stamp: 1187116009
> Building the build Environment
>  -> extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/sid.tgz]
>  -> creating local configuration
>  -> copying local configuration
>  -> mounting /proc filesystem
>  -> mounting /dev/pts filesystem
[...]
> dh_installdeb
> dh_shlibdeps
> dh_gencontrol
> dh_md5sums
> dh_builddeb
> dpkg-deb: building package `reppu' in `../reppu_0.1-3_i386.deb'.
>  dpkg-genchanges
> dpkg-genchanges: not including original source code in upload
> dpkg-buildpackage: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included)
> Copying back the cached apt archive contents
>  -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
>  -> unmounting proc filesystem
>  -> cleaning the build env 
>     -> removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//25966 and its subdirectories
> Current time: Tue Aug 14 18:31:03 UTC 2007
> pbuilder-time-stamp: 1187116263
> Checking reppu_0.1-3_i386.deb for stripped binaries...
> ---------------------------------------
> /tmp/reppu_0.1-3_i386.deb/usr/bin/reppu: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
> 
> ...done
> Removing result files...
> ...done
> ******************************************************************************
> Finished with status POST_BUILD_FAILED at 2007-08-14 18:31:10.265444
> Build needed 0:04:25.592922

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.1-3+rm

The reppu package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/280028 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org

--- End Message ---
Reply to: