[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#423212: marked as done (laptop-netconf: please build-depend on libnet1-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:59:32 GMT
with message-id <200812051959.mB5JxWum015042@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line laptop-netconf has been removed from Debian, closing #423212
has caused the Debian Bug report #423212,
regarding laptop-netconf: please build-depend on libnet1-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

423212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423212
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: laptop-netconf
Severity: normal


would it be possible to make laptop-netconf build-depend on
libnet1-dev instead of libnet0-dev?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages laptop-netconf depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.13     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                         2.5-7      GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libnet0                       1.0.2a-7   library for the construction and h
ii  libpcap0.8                    0.9.5-1    System interface for user-level pa

laptop-netconf recommends no packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

The laptop-netconf package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/507854 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: