[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#423213: marked as done (idswakeup: please build-depend on libnet1-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:01:06 GMT
with message-id <200812052001.mB5K16bD015093@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line idswakeup has been removed from Debian, closing #423213
has caused the Debian Bug report #423213,
regarding idswakeup: please build-depend on libnet1-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
423213: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423213
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: idswakeup
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: normal


Hi,

would it be possible to make idswakeup build-depend on libnet1-dev
instead of libnet0-dev?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages idswakeup depends on:
pn  hping2                        <none>     (no description available)
ii  libc6                         2.5-7      GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libnet0                       1.0.2a-7   library for the construction and h

idswakeup recommends no packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.0-5+rm

The idswakeup package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/507853 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org

--- End Message ---
Reply to: