[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#303330: marked as done (dhcp addressing does not seem to be supported)

Your message dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:59:29 GMT
with message-id <200812051959.mB5JxTgV015022@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line laptop-netconf has been removed from Debian, closing #303330
has caused the Debian Bug report #303330,
regarding dhcp addressing does not seem to be supported
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
303330: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=303330
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Package: laptop-netconf
Version: 0.9.6.1
Severity: normal

- From what I can tell in the sample configuration files and the
/etc/laptop-netconf/opts file, it does not seem that DHCP-acquired
addresses are supported.  Since laptops very often use DHCP, this
severely limits the package's utility.  If DHCP-acquired addresses are
supported, an example in the sample files and some documentation would
be quite useful.

Regards,
- --
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com

Registered Linux User #368650
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCU1ESHuKcDICy0QoRAu/6AJ9i5Ni9zMoTUtSu2oY68PM6vTBDfwCeOnfR
W5SdHabVIwEenZdD3vF0e/Y=
=5CLn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.9.6.9+rm

The laptop-netconf package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/507854 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org

--- End Message ---
Reply to: