On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:59:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote: > > > >> I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you disagree, > > > >> please reply to this message by Thijs Kinkhorst: > > > >> > > > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;mbox=yes;bug=496411 > > > > I confirm the README.Debian is present. > > > But not in the affected binary package. > > Indeed, is there an ETA for this bug? At least for the unstable (i.e. with > > maintainer QA) version. > > > > FWIW as the fix looks trivial I think it is worth keeping the package. > > I disagree. I doubt that the version in unstable/testing is useful for > anyone, and if it is, it is still available in etch anyway. > So I would go for removing it from testing. Fair enough, given also the low popcon filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it. -- Oscar Wilde
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature