[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#444062: marked as done (astrolog: Examples should go in examples directory)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:39:37 GMT
with message-id <200811281039.mASAdbc5012514@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line astrolog has been removed from Debian, closing #444062
has caused the Debian Bug report #444062,
regarding astrolog: Examples should go in examples directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
444062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444062
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: astrolog
Version: 5.40-3tk3
Severity: minor

Files /usr/share/doc/astrolog/astrolog.cgi.gz and
/usr/share/doc/astrolog/fixplaces should go in an examples directory
(policy 12.6).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (989, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-tk (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages astrolog depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.6.1-1    GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libx11-6                      2:1.0.3-7  X11 client-side library

astrolog recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 5.40-3+rm

The astrolog package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/361346 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org

--- End Message ---
Reply to: