[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#412839: marked as done (openmotif is not autobuilt, misses several archs (ia64, mipsel, s390))



Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:32:13 +0000
with message-id <E1KKxMz-0003md-4I@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#412839: fixed in openmotif 2.2.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #412839,
regarding openmotif is not autobuilt, misses several archs (ia64, mipsel, s390)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
412839: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=412839
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openmotif
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: important

Hi there,

openmotif is a non-free package with Architecture:any. You should
investigate if it can safely be autobuilt, and follow the instructions
in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html
if applicable.

This problem is blocking openmotif and other packages (e.g arb) out of
testing.

Or maybe it's just better to remove it from Debian ?
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openmotif
Source-Version: 2.2.3-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openmotif, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libmotif-dev_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/o/openmotif/libmotif-dev_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
libmotif3_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/o/openmotif/libmotif3_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
motif-clients_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/o/openmotif/motif-clients_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
openmotif_2.2.3-3.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/o/openmotif/openmotif_2.2.3-3.diff.gz
openmotif_2.2.3-3.dsc
  to pool/non-free/o/openmotif/openmotif_2.2.3-3.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 412839@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> (supplier of updated openmotif package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:33:39 +0200
Source: openmotif
Binary: libmotif3 libmotif-dev motif-clients
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Description: 
 libmotif-dev - Open Motif - development files
 libmotif3  - Open Motif - shared libraries
 motif-clients - Open Motif - X11 clients (mwm, xmbind)
Closes: 378978 412839 491385
Changes: 
 openmotif (2.2.3-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Replace xlibs-data with xbitmaps in the build dependencies
     (Thanks to Peter Green <plugwash@p10link.net>)
     Closes: #491385
   * debhelper version (>= 6.0.7) in Build-Dependencies because of
     using dh_lintian
   * Added Homepage field in debian/contol
   * Standards-Version: 3.8.0 (no changes needed)
   * Replaced debian/rules:export DH_COMPAT=4
     by debian/compat: 4
   * Removed x-dev build-dependency
   * debian/control: XS-Autobuild: yes
     This and a mail to nonfree@release.debian.NET
     Closes: #412839
   * Add several lintian overrides especially for problems
     in man pages.  In principle these warnings should not
     be overriden but there are so many that some really important
     ones might be overlooked - so I just decided for hiding
     minor problems for the moment.
   * Attach the upstream LICENSE file to debian/copyright to
     make sure we have only ony license file
     These both items might be server the point of _some_ love
     given in bug #378978 - I would agree to reopen the bug that
     it needs some _more_ love.
     Closes: #378978
Checksums-Sha1: 
 5ec9d657169809c678fecb8b0a7a73ab5d1eafdc 1162 openmotif_2.2.3-3.dsc
 45d0ed8b3d66e7eb619f8074a0981d52a2bb5ccb 26544 openmotif_2.2.3-3.diff.gz
 dfa5f66ba50939b9e801846d368a19edfce66e34 1308376 libmotif3_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
 911817376a5b551948d3c6c7f62afa85a1bf6ffe 2822576 libmotif-dev_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
 daa94707fbf73bd2b65d4cc81d6e18bef38c5f59 171916 motif-clients_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 d2d04fe80405a96fd3fffb717308be84495470afecf68a8db3431d1947873515 1162 openmotif_2.2.3-3.dsc
 a29c72a53f88617541123bd0a737c58bb94de4d9c53fd64b0aa07797e2323645 26544 openmotif_2.2.3-3.diff.gz
 f41ae27ead31fdc9cf2b08105766052051746a8ec4fce7aa79a72c9512d0cc84 1308376 libmotif3_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
 446dac92d5e5de99540d791b8863c87e651f24da0062dfc3ed6439516a8f04a7 2822576 libmotif-dev_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
 2af3ff5120a4f9290284465addefacbe7d8577f7e251f4f2d169b5c15b59a951 171916 motif-clients_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
Files: 
 d78fd91b4e5ca8ca18875bb41fb21199 1162 non-free/devel extra openmotif_2.2.3-3.dsc
 f2401a0060252b7b51fdbc5364e878ba 26544 non-free/devel extra openmotif_2.2.3-3.diff.gz
 d5551949c1de826ccfc45f14c39ec08d 1308376 non-free/libs extra libmotif3_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
 8a683360766e39f87520b36feaa648d9 2822576 non-free/libdevel extra libmotif-dev_2.2.3-3_i386.deb
 e7439d011288433a08462b0d85339f2b 171916 non-free/x11 extra motif-clients_2.2.3-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIhKiVYDBbMcCf01oRAkp3AJ42QPVfHCBTfulS7vFTX9KqYDqfYwCgpatS
eqSKp8ukX2t0DlvLTvSJuoM=
=Vazo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: