[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#409051: marked as done (dcc-client: DCC should start before SpamAssassin)

Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 15:28:41 +0100
with message-id <200805051428.m45ESfgD019043@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line dcc has been removed from Debian, closing #409051
has caused the Debian Bug report #409051,
regarding dcc-client: DCC should start before SpamAssassin
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

409051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dcc-client
Version: 1.2.74-4
Severity: normal

Right now dcc-client is started by /etc/rc*.d/S20dcc-client and
SpamAssassin by /etc/rc*.d/S19spamassassin, with the result that at
system startup, SpamAssassin is unable to find the dccifd.socket,
and consequently falls back on dccproc.

The best way to address this would be to either move dcc-client to <= S18
or to move SpamAssassin to >= S21.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages dcc-client depends on:
ii  dcc-common                   1.2.74-4    Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

dcc-client recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.42-5+rm

The dcc package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/464161 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: