[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#361930: marked as done (dcc-client: dccproc exits with a segfault when run with a particulary long URL in HTML <a href=...>)

Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 15:28:58 +0100
with message-id <200805051428.m45ESwNZ019080@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line dcc has been removed from Debian, closing #361930
has caused the Debian Bug report #361930,
regarding dcc-client: dccproc exits with a segfault when run with a particulary long URL in HTML <a href=...>
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

361930: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=361930
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dcc-client
Version: 1.2.74-2
Severity: normal

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10patched
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR@euro)

Versions of packages dcc-client depends on:
ii  dcc-common                  1.2.74-2     Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

see http://falcal.net/dccproc_segfault for an example of file making
dccproc segfault.

This has been corrected in the 1.3-branch of dcc-client :
    Fix crash in dccm, dccifd, and dccproc while computing FUZ2 checksum
    on URLs with very long host names in HTML mail messages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.42-5+rm

The dcc package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/464161 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: