[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#450994: marked as done ([INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation)



Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 12:41:29 +0100
with message-id <200805051141.m45BfTtJ014671@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line x10 has been removed from Debian, closing #450994
has caused the Debian Bug report #450994,
regarding [INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
450994: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450994
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: x10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find attached the dutch po-debconf translation. Please add 
it to your next package revision, it should be inserted in your package 
build-tree as debian/po/nl.po, TIA.

Feel free to mail me if this file needs updating at some future date.
-- 
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)

Attachment: nl.po
Description: application/gettext

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.06-16+rm

The x10 package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/268912 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org


--- End Message ---

Reply to: