Bug#470758: (no subject)
libspf is currently orphaned in Debian and upstream is currently missing, so I
think it's fair game for any reasonable interpretation of what doing the
right thing is.
I've done a few things to get libspf back into Testing, but am really not up
for maintaining the package, so I'd say go ahead and do what you think is
right.
I am a pyspf maintainer upstream and the Debian maintainer for the package.
It used to use a recursion limit too and so I have some experience with this
is a similar library and some opinions on what it should do....
I think the behavior described in #464029 is definitely wrong. I think is the
recursion limit is reached, some kind of error should definitely be reached.
I think it's open to debate if libspf or spfmilter should be resetting the
recursion level. I think it's likely harmless if it's it's done in libspf
(worst case it gets reset twice), so I think your idea is in the right
direction, but should also raise and error (return unknown for a result).
Note: I don't code C, so I've no opinion on the implementation in the patch.
Reply to: