--- Begin Message ---
Package: twin
Severity: important
Version: 4.5.1-3
Tags: patch
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
It needs to exclude linux specific package in Build-Depends
and small tweak. Please find attached patch with both changes.
It would also be nice if you can ask upstream
to include change in configure/configure.in.
Thanks in advance
Petr
diff -u twin-0.5.1/debian/control twin-0.5.1/debian/control
--- twin-0.5.1/debian/control
+++ twin-0.5.1/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Marco Bodrato <bodrato@gulp.linux.it>
Uploaders: Marco Presi (Zufus) <zufus@debian.org>, Marco Bodrato <bodrato@gulp.linux.it>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libgpmg1-dev, libncurses5-dev, libx11-dev, libxpm-dev, x-dev, zlib1g-dev, m4, dpatch
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libgpmg1-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386], libncurses5-dev, libx11-dev, libxpm-dev, x-dev, zlib1g-dev, m4, dpatch
Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1
Package: twin
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- twin-0.5.1.orig/configure.in
+++ twin-0.5.1/configure.in
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
])
AC_CACHE_CHECK(for shared library support, ac_cv_sys_shlibs, [
- if test "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = Linux -o "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = FreeBSD; then
+ if test "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = Linux -o "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = "GNU/kFreeBSD" -o "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = FreeBSD; then
if test "$ac_cv_prog_gcc" = yes; then
ac_cv_sys_shlibs=native
fi
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- twin-0.5.1.orig/configure
+++ twin-0.5.1/configure
@@ -1743,7 +1743,7 @@
echo $ac_n "(cached) $ac_c" 1>&6
else
- if test "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = Linux -o "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = FreeBSD; then
+ if test "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = Linux -o "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = "GNU/kFreeBSD" -o "$ac_cv_sys_uname" = FreeBSD; then
if test "$ac_cv_prog_gcc" = yes; then
ac_cv_sys_shlibs=native
fi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.4.0-7
The twin package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/446692 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---