Bug#457961: marked as done (dillo fails to build twice in a row)
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:02:02 +0000
with message-id <E1JEsv4-0000aY-HX@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#457961: fixed in dillo 0.8.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dillo
Severity: serious
Hi,
Nicolas reported that dillo fails to build twice in a row.
As this is considered an RC issue because beeing able to build twice in
a row is a release goal for lenny [1] I forward this to the BTS,
so that others can track this.
Best Regards
Patrick
[1] http://release.debian.org/lenny-goals.txt
----- Forwarded message from Nicolas Valcarcel <nvalcarcel@ubuntu-pe.org> -----
From: Nicolas Valcarcel <nvalcarcel@ubuntu-pe.org>
To: schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:05:05 -0500
Subject: problem unpatching dillo
I'm getting this error every time i debuild dillo for second time, and
as i see on the changelog you develop the patch, can you take a look on
it please?
$ debuild -rfakeroot
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dpatch deapply-all
reverting patch 02_dont-ignore-hash-files from ./ ... ok.
reverting patch 01_i18n from ./ ... failed.
make: *** [unpatch] Error 1
debuild: fatal error at line 1247:
fakeroot debian/rules clean failed
--
aka nxvl
Peruvian LoCo Team
Key fingerprint = 8104 21CE A580 7EB7 5184 8DFF 6A3A D5DA 24DC 6AF5
gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 24DC6AF5
----- End forwarded message -----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dillo
Source-Version: 0.8.6-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dillo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dillo_0.8.6-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dillo/dillo_0.8.6-2.diff.gz
dillo_0.8.6-2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dillo/dillo_0.8.6-2.dsc
dillo_0.8.6-2_amd64.deb
to pool/main/d/dillo/dillo_0.8.6-2_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 457961@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org> (supplier of updated dillo package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:49:16 +0100
Source: dillo
Binary: dillo
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.8.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>
Description:
dillo - Small and fast web browser
Closes: 457394 457961
Changes:
dillo (0.8.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* Fixed a problem with unpatch related to config.{sub,guess}. Fix based
on patches sent in by Bart Martens and Nicolas Valcarcel (thanks, guys!)
(Closes: #457961, #457394).
* Fixed spelling error in debian/NEWS.
* Added fields to .desktop: Categories, GenericName, MimeType, and [lt]
translations as suggested by Mantas Kriauciunas (thanks!).
Files:
c9ea25e5f2b321ecb135f6e31036733d 743 web extra dillo_0.8.6-2.dsc
6b05ee3664dcca9b38c9ff10b0089061 429941 web extra dillo_0.8.6-2.diff.gz
bccfd9dd47c7c82b9c00e4313548c1b2 427524 web extra dillo_0.8.6-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHjR1wtzWmSeC6BMERApT0AKCX05Nhak4aoN33LCGA4m6yqNUmtgCfcEVm
o5NIo+HeE8zQ7DBqzMRfqbw=
=FV9s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: