[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#436365: linux-igd - FTBFS: iptc.c:9:41: error: linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h: No such file or directory



Package: linux-igd
Version: 0.cvs20060201-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070806

hi,

while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:

 > iptc.c:9:41: error: linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h: No such file or directory
 [..]
 > iptc.c:397: error: 'IP_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED' undeclared (first use in this function)
 > iptc.c:397: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
 > iptc.c:397: error: for each function it appears in.)
 > iptc.c:402: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:403: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:409: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:410: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:420: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:420: error: 'IP_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS' undeclared (first use in this function)
 > iptc.c:429: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:432: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:434: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:434: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c: At top level:
 > iptc.c:442: warning: 'struct ip_nat_range' declared inside parameter list
 > iptc.c:442: error: conflicting types for 'append_range'
 > iptc.c:30: error: previous declaration of 'append_range' was here
 > iptc.c: In function 'append_range':
 > iptc.c:446: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > iptc.c:451: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
 > make[1]: *** [iptc.o] Error 1
 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/linux-igd-0.cvs20060201'
 > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

The Full Build log is available and can be viewed at:

 http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/08/06/
 
bye,
	- michael



Reply to: