[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#427743: flac123 - FTBFS: checking for FLAC__file_decoder_new in -lFLAC... no

Package: flac123
Version: 0.0.9-4
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs


while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:

 >  debian/rules build
 > dh_testdir
 > # Configuring package
 > CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --host=i486-linux-gnu --build=i486-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
 > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
 > checking whether build environment is sane... yes
 > checking for gawk... no
 > checking for mawk... mawk
 > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
 > checking for i486-linux-gnu-gcc... i486-linux-gnu-gcc
 > checking for C compiler default output... a.out
 > checking whether the C compiler works... yes
 > checking whether we are cross compiling... no
 > checking for suffix of executables... 
 > checking for suffix of object files... o
 > checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
 > checking whether i486-linux-gnu-gcc accepts -g... yes
 > checking for i486-linux-gnu-gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
 > checking for style of include used by make... GNU
 > checking dependency style of i486-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc3
 > checking for FLAC__file_decoder_new in -lFLAC... no
 > configure: error: FLAC required!
 > make: *** [config.status] Error 1

I think this is related to an API change and recent upload of a new FLAC
Library, from libflac-dev's changelog:

  * New upstream release. closes: #405167, #411311
    - libOggFLAC and libOggFLAC++ have been merged into libFLAC, so
      remove their corresponding packages.
    - Because of the API changes required to effect the above, there has
      been yet another soname bump. libflac7 -> libflac8 and
      libflac++5 -> libflac++6. Emails have been dispatched to the
      maintainers of dependent packages.

The Full Build log is available and can be viewed at:

	- michael

Reply to: