[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#243501: lush



Dear Everyone,

I am going to adopt the package lush (so it doesn't get removed from
Debian) under Debian GNU/Linux OS, thus I want to fix few bugs
before I upload it under my name.

This is a follow-up to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=243501
lush_1.0+cvs.2004.04.02(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: errors during data
file build and relevant to

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267494
M/P-a-s: lush [ia64] -- RoM; ia64-ELF issues

It seems that this issue is no longer existent on ia64 platform
for sid.  Please see full build log (running within uptodate sid ia64
chroot using pdebuild)
http://www.onerussian.com/Linux/bugs/lush/ia64/lush-build.log
(also built fine within a chroot on ia64 debian box)

Absent upstream changelog forbids me to guess what upstream
release/change has fixed this bug, but current sid version seems to
build fine and runs as well (or as bad) as on any other platform (during
simple testing), thus I question a statement made in #267494: "Lush does
not work on ia64, and it is only accidental that past builds worked.".
It *does* work on ia64 and was working - it just wasn't building
right ;-)

Dear maintainers of packages-arch-specific, please remove lush entry
(which was marked as ANAIS so not fully inspected if I understood that
abbreviate correctly ;-)), so it could be built in a regular fashion for
ia64, and would allow me to close relevant bug.

Thanks everyone in advance
-- 
                                  .-.
=------------------------------   /v\  ----------------------------=
Keep in touch                    // \\     (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko              /(   )\               ICQ#: 60653192
                   Linux User    ^^-^^    [175555]


Attachment: pgp4xBWtf_Z9X.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: