[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#347009: marked as done (multi-gnome-terminal: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:12:25 +0200
with message-id <87mzebf9zq.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of multi-gnome-terminal 1.6.2-11.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: multi-gnome-terminal
Version: 1.6.2-11
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

    [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

    [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

    [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

    [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: multi-gnome-terminal
Source-Version: 1.6.2-11.1

Now that multi-gnome-terminal is orphaned, bugs fixed in non-maintainer
uploads can be closed.  The original .changes file follows.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:57:16 +0100
Source: multi-gnome-terminal
Binary: multi-gnome-terminal multi-gnome-terminal-doc
Architecture: all i386 source 
Version: 1.6.2-11.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@debian.org>
Changed-By: Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@debian.org>
Description: 
 multi-gnome-terminal - Enhanced the GNOME Terminal
 multi-gnome-terminal-doc - Enhanced the GNOME Terminal -- documentation files
Closes: 347009
Changes: 
 multi-gnome-terminal (1.6.2-11.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Replace build-dependency on xlibs-dev with an explicit build-dependency
     on each required package. (Closes: #347009)
Files: 
 544304e3c8292e025ae687716249af50 1126 x11 optional multi-gnome-terminal_1.6.2-11.1.dsc
 115f81db5aee85d69b2db79a1d66b4ab 27772 x11 optional multi-gnome-terminal_1.6.2-11.1.diff.gz
 79d2618e89d65468dc697087e691ad88 293500 gnome optional multi-gnome-terminal_1.6.2-11.1_i386.deb
 9b1ebc8943a4e3b23b0bba56d6d48057 1201392 doc optional multi-gnome-terminal-doc_1.6.2-11.1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQ9IwUH7hqgLJpbVOAQIFawQAjXsRpXqSqQLf0ycB7HWyso+mnollxebF
096ZO4CC/pv78Y69Z9Tdzhm91oA+V911+qdtwMQN0H3rMhhPreIvXdpVx9d2taUT
hkAzgneuvP/RPcIW+Yso1I7mpfpOxNweq7NpmBgpnBMHN3fMbprKygibAwXm6xRP
pv61Y2r09mE=
=Sfj9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: