[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#304700: marked as done (elvis: Visual { and } commands behaving incorrectly relative to documentation)



Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:17:21 -0800
with message-id <E1EwRnt-0005C9-VO@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#304700: fixed in elvis 2.2.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 20:07:13 +0000
>From dsherohman@westling.com Thu Apr 14 13:07:12 2005
Return-path: <dsherohman@westling.com>
Received: from 208-38-72-136.rev.nsatel.net (econoline.westling.com) [208.38.72.136] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DMAcK-0000ES-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:07:12 -0700
Received: from peterbilt
	([192.168.23.31] helo=peterbilt.west.westling.com ident=Debian-exim)
	by econoline.westling.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DMAcJ-0006MU-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:07:11 -0500
Received: from dsherohman by peterbilt.west.westling.com with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DMAcK-0001YK-JG
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:07:12 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dave Sherohman <dsherohman@westling.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: elvis: Visual { and } commands behaving incorrectly relative to documentation
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:07:12 -0500
Message-Id: <E1DMAcK-0001YK-JG@peterbilt.west.westling.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: elvis
Version: 2.2.0-3
Severity: normal


The behaviour of the { and } movement commands in elvis 2.2.0 is
inconsistent with that described in the 2.2.0 documentation, as well as
with previous versions (up to 2.1.4).  Specifically, while the documentation states that:

   count {
          count }
          These commands move backward or forward to the start of a
          paragraph. The start of a paragraph is defined to be the first
          blank line encountered after a non-blank line; or a line which
          contains a troff paragraph command listed in the paragraphs
          option's value; or the start of a section as described below.
...
                   The start of a section is defined to be '{' character
          in column 1 of a line; or a troff section command listed in the
          value of the sections option.

and previous versions behaved in this manner, version 2.2.0 considers
any '{' character encountered on a line beginning with a non-whitespace
character to be the beginning of a section, even if the '{' is not in
column 1.

e.g.:
This { is considered to be a start-of-section.
 This { is not.





-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages elvis depends on:
ii  elvis-common             2.2.0-3         common files for elvis, elvis-cons
ii  libc6                    2.3.2.ds1-20    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5              5.4-4           Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libx11-6                 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxft2                  2.1.2-6         FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxpm4                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X pixmap library

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 22:25:38 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jan 10 14:25:38 2006
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EwRnt-0005C9-VO; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:17:21 -0800
From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>
To: 304700-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#304700: fixed in elvis 2.2.0-5
Message-Id: <E1EwRnt-0005C9-VO@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:17:21 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: elvis
Source-Version: 2.2.0-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
elvis, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

elvis-common_2.2.0-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/elvis/elvis-common_2.2.0-5_all.deb
elvis-console_2.2.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elvis/elvis-console_2.2.0-5_i386.deb
elvis-tools_2.2.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elvis/elvis-tools_2.2.0-5_i386.deb
elvis_2.2.0-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/elvis/elvis_2.2.0-5.diff.gz
elvis_2.2.0-5.dsc
  to pool/main/e/elvis/elvis_2.2.0-5.dsc
elvis_2.2.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/elvis/elvis_2.2.0-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 304700@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in> (supplier of updated elvis package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:27:56 +0530
Source: elvis
Binary: elvis-tools elvis-common elvis elvis-console
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.2.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>
Changed-By: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>
Description: 
 elvis      - powerful clone of the vi/ex text editor (with X11 support)
 elvis-common - common files for elvis, elvis-console and elvis-tools
 elvis-console - powerful clone of the vi/ex text editor (without X11 support)
 elvis-tools - text editing tools for programmers (elvfmt, elvtags, ref)
Closes: 304700 341821
Changes: 
 elvis (2.2.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Maintainer. Closes: #341821.
   * Indicate the 'tweaksection' variable in the
     explanation of the '{' movement. Closes: #304700.
   * Fixed hyphen-used-as-minus-sign.
   * Fixed changelog to disable lintian warnings regarding
     missing dates in Bill Mitchell's original entries. The
     date is an estimate!
   * Incorporated patch by QA group into elvis' patch
     infrastructure.
Files: 
 485ebe72eed17fbd0b18981302eaa777 652 editors optional elvis_2.2.0-5.dsc
 439f304f5393495a35227aee634e6c2e 22248 editors optional elvis_2.2.0-5.diff.gz
 4e5d224e669408acbff82e583ad322be 322876 editors optional elvis_2.2.0-5_i386.deb
 ed3420792ced1d64de65ec9b97b640da 284748 editors optional elvis-console_2.2.0-5_i386.deb
 dd0f08acab6f4ad0a56fc204e5f5f49c 22286 editors optional elvis-tools_2.2.0-5_i386.deb
 a68454bd9c88f17246316d87cb20b40e 673414 editors optional elvis-common_2.2.0-5_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxBE9+YXjQAr8dHYRAhjtAJ4/XwdxZrLRE0ID9GOaPv2XVTUv4gCfeBOQ
xgR4eKSoTEgqTen+hXr7yiM=
=b3yx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: