Re: Matej Vela in <[🔎] 20050919091008.GI7473@diziet.irb.hr> > > Hi, > > ist cabot still not ready for testing? > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > should we wait until someone adopts it? As one of the caff/signing-party people, I can say that caff serves the same purpose as cabot, is a lot easier to setup and use, and has the saner address verification "protocol". I'd opt for removing cabot, but if there's someone to continue upstream, that's also fine. Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature