Bug#184746: marked as done (twin: Debian Package is outdated)
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:26:14 -0700
with message-id <E1EG2BK-0004Nd-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#184746: fixed in twin 0.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2003 13:46:58 +0000
>From zufus@zufus.org Fri Mar 14 07:46:58 2003
Return-path: <zufus@zufus.org>
Received: from (sit2.nodalis.it) [213.188.192.68]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tpWT-0008QC-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:46:57 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Marco Presi (Zufus)" <zufus@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: twin: Debian Package is outdated
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:51:35 +0100
Message-Id: <20030314135135.4BF63289@zufus.org>
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: twin
Version: 0.4.0-4
Severity: wishlist
Twin is at version 0.4.5 since many months, while last deb package (in
unstable too) is 0.4.0.
There is a reason for this?
Marco
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tok 2.4.19 #2 ven dic 27 15:37:52 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro
Versions of packages twin depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-8 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-14 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii libtw 3.0.8-1 a Text mode WINdow environment - r
ii xlibs 4.2.1-6 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-11 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184746-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 22:39:32 +0000
>From joerg@spohr.debian.org Thu Sep 15 15:39:32 2005
Return-path: <joerg@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EG2BK-0004Nd-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:26:14 -0700
From: Marco Presi (Zufus) <zufus@debian.org>
To: 184746-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#184746: fixed in twin 0.5.1-1
Message-Id: <E1EG2BK-0004Nd-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:26:14 -0700
Delivered-To: 184746-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: twin
Source-Version: 0.5.1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
twin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libtw0-dev_4.5.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/twin/libtw0-dev_4.5.1-1_i386.deb
libtw0_4.5.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/twin/libtw0_4.5.1-1_i386.deb
twin_0.5.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/twin/twin_0.5.1-1.diff.gz
twin_0.5.1-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/twin/twin_0.5.1-1.dsc
twin_0.5.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/twin/twin_0.5.1-1_i386.deb
twin_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/twin/twin_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 184746@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marco Presi (Zufus) <zufus@debian.org> (supplier of updated twin package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:33:31 -0400
Source: twin
Binary: libtw0-dev libtw0 twin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marco Bodrato <bodrato@gulp.linux.it>
Changed-By: Marco Presi (Zufus) <zufus@debian.org>
Description:
libtw0 - a Text mode WINdow environment - required library
libtw0-dev - a Text mode WINdow environment library, development
twin - a Text mode WINdow environment
Closes: 184746 238031 297825 317997
Changes:
twin (0.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes: #238031).
* New upstream release (Closes: #184746).
* Upstream moved twdm to /usr/sbin/twdm (correct since it depends on
library in /usr/lib)
* Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>: integration of various patches:
- build with gcc-4.0 (Closes: #297825).
- added shlibs:Depends in debian/control (Closes: 317997).
- Corrected typos in control and README.Debian files
* Marco Bodrato:
- Removed Changelog.txt from docs, it is changelog!
- Removed assembly code from shared libs (generating non PIC code)
- Fixed rawkbd
* libtw renamed to libtw0
* bumped standard-versions to 3.6.2.1
Files:
63a8e2bbc1c5e500a59369531911669a 731 utils optional twin_0.5.1-1.dsc
28dab6c9b3e0d4c4ca508270ba19b28c 1341448 utils optional twin_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz
8d59c64d10fbbef4898d8781234340af 9648 utils optional twin_0.5.1-1.diff.gz
b1656cdb5c8e440965e263a8bc557f0c 439838 utils optional twin_0.5.1-1_i386.deb
93fed562bc71b92cbdd885230c289182 277720 libs optional libtw0_4.5.1-1_i386.deb
0f2dfdd47f8278da8d85c78d123bec0d 404412 devel optional libtw0-dev_4.5.1-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDJlXeh0XdeHWCwhoRAjKnAKCj+MoIuDA3wd2xGvsczCWvkNxcjQCfSs4p
5GMJGmEpC6vTsw6C64ejylo=
=U0Wu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: