Bug#295791: marked as done (libio-stty-perl has no man page pod)
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jul 2005 14:47:46 +0100
with message-id <20050709134746.GA7044@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
and subject line libio-stty-perl has no man page pod
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 02:18:11 +0000
>From mlaks2000@yahoo.com Thu Feb 17 18:18:11 2005
Return-path: <mlaks2000@yahoo.com>
Received: from web51909.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.52]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1xid-0003HJ-00; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:18:11 -0800
Received: (qmail 73903 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Feb 2005 02:17:40 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
b=MiYDBvjJ16yghs79kwClptNPq/s+wkRWCG/Z4ltLGcqWhuJc3SmnoIVbqizmb0aQb0GKpJaySIYte4d3+SG5gjI/a98TArjUhN4IQWhi67UHZ2gnGYNW5ZZs8dG/c5iVQ0tCndkFOqaFepqL6Zb8A0tpzRvjy3p/VLlUq77FMbk= ;
Message-ID: <20050218021740.73901.qmail@web51909.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [216.255.101.5] by web51909.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:17:40 PST
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:17:40 -0800 (PST)
From: m laks <mlaks2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: libio-stty-perl has no man page pod
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: Libio-stty-perl
Version:0.02-7
Hi i installed and when i run perldoc IO:Stty no man
page.
I compare with the expect module.
dpkg -L libexpect-perl
/.
/usr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/perl5
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/README
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/README.Debian
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/2.B.rlogin
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/README
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/4.A.top
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/6.A.smtp-verify
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/6.B.modem-init
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/5.A.top
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/5.B.top
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/3.A.debugging
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/1.A.Intro
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/examples/2.A.ftp
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/Expect.pod.gz
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/libexpect-perl/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/man
/usr/share/man/man3
/usr/share/man/man3/Expect.3pm.gz
/usr/share/perl5
/usr/share/perl5/Expect.pod
/usr/share/perl5/Expect.pm
while for
seconddebian:~# dpkg -L libio-stty-perl
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/perl5
/usr/share/perl5/IO
/usr/share/perl5/IO/stty.pl
/usr/share/perl5/IO/Stty.pm
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libio-stty-perl
/usr/share/doc/libio-stty-perl/stty.txt.gz
/usr/share/doc/libio-stty-perl/README
/usr/share/doc/libio-stty-perl/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libio-stty-perl/examples
/usr/share/doc/libio-stty-perl/examples/stty.pl
/usr/share/doc/libio-stty-perl/changelog.Debian.gz
see we are missing the
/usr/share/man
/usr/share/man/man3
/usr/share/man/man3/Expect.3pm.gz
/usr/usr/share/man
/usr/share/man/man3
/usr/share/man/man3/Expect.3pm.gz
/usr/share/perl5
/usr/share/perl5/Expect.pod
/usr/share/perl5/Expect.pm
/share/perl5
/usr/share/perl5/Expect.pod
/usr/share/perl5/Expect.pm
we are missing the man and pod stuff.
On the other hand I love you for making the package!!!
How do we complete it?
Thanks!!!!!!
Gratefully yours,
Mitchell Laks
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295791-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2005 13:47:47 +0000
>From sjq@debian.org Sat Jul 09 06:47:47 2005
Return-path: <sjq@debian.org>
Received: from relay4.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DrFgJ-0000Zd-00; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 06:47:47 -0700
Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247])
by relay4.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DrFgI-0001dE-EZ
for 295791-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:47:46 +0100
Received: from mizar.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.107] helo=localhost)
by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1DrFgI-0002zl-3z
for 295791-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:47:46 +0100
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 14:47:46 +0100
From: Stephen Quinney <sjq@debian.org>
To: 295791-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: libio-stty-perl has no man page pod
Message-ID: <20050709134746.GA7044@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050321024604.22748.qmail@web51902.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Operating-System: Linux mizar 2.6.11.10
x-gpg-fingerprint: F934 244D 4E26 DBDE C9EF BFB7 2131 9B94 4C1A 5BE5
x-gpg-key: wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 295791-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Closing bug on request of original submitter.
Stephen Quinney
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:46:04 -0800 (PST) m laks wrote:
>
> I withdraw the bug. I did not know enough to look
> through the file for the pod. Now I figured that out
> and then I looked and saw there was no documentation
> to extract as a separate file.
>
> Sorry to bother you about this...
>
Reply to: