Hi!
Even though the original codebase might be unclean, and it is uncertain
whether snacc should be replaced by eSnacc, I don't see any reason why
this proposed bugfix is not applied to make the package build.
Other packages have build-dependencies on snacc (I originally just
wanted to compile kismet on amd64)...
Thanks for your consideration!
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> http://gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature