[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#250428: marked as done (squidguard: source contains cruft)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <49279.>
and subject line squidguard: source contains cruft
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2004 21:49:09 +0000
>From toni@oeko.net Sat May 22 14:49:09 2004
Return-path: <toni@oeko.net>
Received: from pd9511838.dip.t-dialin.net (spruce) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BReMe-0004Ur-00; Sat, 22 May 2004 14:49:09 -0700
Received: (qmail 7221 invoked by uid 1001); 22 May 2004 21:47:49 -0000
Message-ID: <20040522214749.7220.qmail@spruce>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Toni Mueller <support@oeko.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: squidguard: source contains cruft
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:47:49 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Package: squidguard
Severity: normal


while trying to import squidguard into an archive for tla-buildpackage,
I find this file which makes tla-importdsc barf:



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro

Received: (at 250428-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2005 23:57:28 +0000
>From kink@squirrelmail.org Sun Dec 18 15:57:28 2005
Return-path: <kink@squirrelmail.org>
Received: from aphrodite.asd.jaze.nl ([] helo=aphrodite.jaze.net)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Eo8PA-0007Ij-4g
	for 250428-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:57:28 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [])
	by aphrodite.jaze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1B816F491
	for <250428-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aphrodite.jaze.net ([])
	by localhost (aphrodite []) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 23241-32 for <250428-done@bugs.debian.org>;
	Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wm.kinkhorst.com (localhost.localdomain [])
	by aphrodite.jaze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C6316F490
	for <250428-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user tklists)
        by wm.kinkhorst.com with HTTP;
        Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <49279.>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: squidguard: source contains cruft
From: "Thijs Kinkhorst" <kink@squirrelmail.org>
To: 250428-done@bugs.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at aphrodite.jaze.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

> > while trying to import squidguard into an archive for tla-buildpackag=
> > I find this file which makes tla-importdsc barf:
> >
> > samples/.sample.conf.swp
> This file is part of the upstream tarball, but is not shipped in the
> binary package. I don't think it's worthwhile to repackage the upstream
> tarball just to remove this file, especially since I don't see what har=
> it does.. if you don't mind I'll close this bug.

No comments, closing.


Reply to: