[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#132940: marked as done (zope-mysqlda should use debconf)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:43 +0100
with message-id <87zmnoaveg.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Feb 2002 10:25:37 +0000
>From devitis@students.cs.unibo.it Fri Feb 08 04:25:37 2002
Return-path: <devitis@students.cs.unibo.it>
Received: from cantina.students.cs.unibo.it [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16Z8Do-00023T-00; Fri, 08 Feb 2002 04:25:36 -0600
Received: from cantina.students.cs.unibo.it (devitis@localhost [])
        by localhost (8.12.0.Beta19/8.12.0.Beta19/Debian 8.12.0.Beta19) with ESMTP id g18APYfk015056
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=192 verify=FAIL)
        for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:25:35 +0100
Received: (from devitis@localhost)
        by cantina.students.cs.unibo.it (8.12.0.Beta19/8.12.0.Beta19/Debian 8.12.0.Beta19) id g18APYCg015054
        for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:25:34 +0100
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:25:34 +0100
From: "Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis" <luca@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: zope-mysqlda should use debconf
Message-ID: <20020208102534.GE8035@students.cs.unibo.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Operating-System: Linux cantina 2.4.12-cantina1 #4 SMP Mon Oct 22 18:06:15 CEST 2001 i686 unknown
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.0 (2001 Sep 26, compiled Dec 12 2001 15:59:22)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 52B3 60E3 68DF B747 1A24  7ED2 85B9 9075 C291 0E41
X-URL: http://CariStudenti.CS.UniBO.IT/~devitis
X-ICQ-UIN: 66094859
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: zope-mysqlda
Version: 2.0.8-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Please, consider to use debconf to configure zope-mysqlda.
Refer to package like zope-parsedxml which i designed to have package
independent config, template and postinst file.

Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$

Received: (at 132940-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 05:13:54 +0000
>From vela@debian.org Mon Nov 28 21:13:54 2005
Return-path: <vela@debian.org>
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([] ident=UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EgxoQ-0004ym-3w; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:13:54 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT5Dawf031809;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:36 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT5DhVi005527;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:43 +0100
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAT5DhxD005525;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:43 +0100
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 132940-done@bugs.debian.org, 298909-done@bugs.debian.org,
        306903-done@bugs.debian.org, 340338-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Removed
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:13:43 +0100
Message-ID: <87zmnoaveg.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 

zope-mysqlda has been removed from Debian after being orphaned for 3
months.  Please see <http://bugs.debian.org/312877> for details.

Reply to: