[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#340513: marked as done (package still ships gconf schemas in /etc)



Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:17:08 -0800
with message-id <E1EfAPs-0004zi-Nz@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#340513: fixed in memprof 0.5.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2005 22:35:03 +0000
>From joss@debian.org Wed Nov 23 14:35:03 2005
Return-path: <joss@debian.org>
Received: from sakura.malsain.org ([82.241.136.161] helo=arrakis.localnet)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Ef3Cg-0000Nr-Rz
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:35:03 -0800
Received: from joss by arrakis.localnet with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1Ef3Cf-0002nj-6s
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:35:01 +0100
Subject: package still ships gconf schemas in /etc
From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aLkmqvLWKGB+nT7XYQxh"
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:35:00 +0100
Message-Id: <1132785300.8541.16.camel@arrakis.localnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--=-aLkmqvLWKGB+nT7XYQxh
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: memprof
Severity: important

There have been several changes in the way GConf works in Debian. The
most important one is the move of all files that have nothing to do
in /etc to follow the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard.

All of this is handled by the dh_gconf debhelper script. In order to
make use of it, your package should do the following:
* build-depend on debhelper (>=3D 4.2.13),
* depend on ${misc:Depends},
* invoke dh_gconf somewhere between dh_install and dh_installdeb. For
packages using cdbs, this is achieved by including gnome.mk.

Don't hesitate to ask me for details.

Regards,
--=20
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

--=-aLkmqvLWKGB+nT7XYQxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDhO6UrSla4ddfhTMRAgaqAKC9Fk92TZD+/fihzAqqSbnxLISs5wCgoMBz
l23w0PYTL591guThhKTZQEo=
=xlc0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-aLkmqvLWKGB+nT7XYQxh--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 340513-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2005 06:21:17 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Wed Nov 23 22:21:16 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EfAPs-0004zi-Nz; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:17:08 -0800
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 340513-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#340513: fixed in memprof 0.5.1-11
Message-Id: <E1EfAPs-0004zi-Nz@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:17:08 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: memprof
Source-Version: 0.5.1-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
memprof, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

memprof_0.5.1-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/memprof/memprof_0.5.1-11.diff.gz
memprof_0.5.1-11.dsc
  to pool/main/m/memprof/memprof_0.5.1-11.dsc
memprof_0.5.1-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/memprof/memprof_0.5.1-11_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 340513@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <vela@debian.org> (supplier of updated memprof package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:04:03 +0100
Source: memprof
Binary: memprof
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.1-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
Description: 
 memprof    - Memory profiler and leak detector
Closes: 340513
Changes: 
 memprof (0.5.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Use dh_gconf to migrate GConf schemas.  Closes: #340513.
   * debian/watch: Add.
Files: 
 5006bd435ee057dbea2673bed6878f3a 672 gnome optional memprof_0.5.1-11.dsc
 db28d14f094565010c7e7c57d493b1e7 255531 gnome optional memprof_0.5.1-11.diff.gz
 b51f8a2c331306996cd75b2ad62c1f3f 388670 gnome optional memprof_0.5.1-11_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDhVgrxBYivKllgY8RArcFAJ4nu5UNK7NoTz5mrsZTCh732lr7gACghy3A
U3uICtAcIx27QgwrnCPOcVs=
=90Mz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: