[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#164532: marked as done (diskless-image-simple: devfsd package not included)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <20050913075521.GA1577@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2002 02:28:13 +0000
>From tho@doma.ballum.wikaba.com Sat Oct 12 21:28:13 2002
Return-path: <tho@doma.ballum.wikaba.com>
Received: from adsl-64-174-90-148.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net (doma.ballum) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 180YUH-00027K-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:28:13 -0500
Received: from tho by doma.ballum with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 180YTm-0005Wh-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:27:42 -0700
From: Guenther Thomsen <tho@doma.ballum.wikaba.com>
Subject: diskless-image-simple: devfsd package not included
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug
Message-Id: <E180YTm-0005Wh-00@doma.ballum>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:27:42 -0700
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: diskless-image-simple
Version: N/A
Severity: normal

The devfsd package needs to be included in the image, if devfs a valid option.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux doma 2.4.19ctx-13 #5 Sat Oct 5 22:37:04 PDT 2002 i686 unknown

Received: (at 164532-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +0000
>From mvela@irb.hr Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <mvela@irb.hr>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [] (UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 77389-done@bugs.debian.org, 88529-done@bugs.debian.org,
        101199-done@bugs.debian.org, 107702-done@bugs.debian.org,
        107721-done@bugs.debian.org, 138817-done@bugs.debian.org,
        144307-done@bugs.debian.org, 158694-done@bugs.debian.org,
        158696-done@bugs.debian.org, 162615-done@bugs.debian.org,
        164531-done@bugs.debian.org, 164532-done@bugs.debian.org,
        246358-done@bugs.debian.org, 246532-done@bugs.debian.org,
        251425-done@bugs.debian.org, 254116-done@bugs.debian.org,
        261829-done@bugs.debian.org, 262905-done@bugs.debian.org,
        293264-done@bugs.debian.org, 293807-done@bugs.debian.org,
        311590-done@bugs.debian.org, 311591-done@bugs.debian.org,
        315516-done@bugs.debian.org, 316658-done@bugs.debian.org,
        319253-done@bugs.debian.org, 326873-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <20050913075521.GA1577@diziet.irb.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on
Delivered-To: 164532-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.  Similar functionality is provided by lessdisks.  For
details, see <http://bugs.debian.org/107808>.

Reply to: